> with the patch applied it improves a little bit ;)
I get for the list I have sent:
snapshot 12/24 12/31 01/07 01/14 +patch
ac 5.8s 6.0s 24.7s 23.0s + 37.9s
aermod 223.9s 227.3s 485.8s 467.6s + 229.6s
air 21.0s 21.6s 8.2s 8.0s - 13.0s
capacita 4.6s 4.7s 5.8s 5.6s 4.6s
channel 2.5s 2.5s 17.6s 17.7s + 2.5s
doduc 19.7s 20.0s 38.6s 37.0s + 24.1s
fatigue 15.0s 15.4s 7.2s 6.8s - 13.7s
gas_dyn 8.6s 8.8s 19.6s 18.5s + 7.9s
induct 28.1s 28.7s 66.1s 61.6s + 25.0s
kepler 0.6s 0.6s 1.1s 1.0s + 0.6s
linpk 1.4s 1.4s 1.4s 1.4s 1.4s
mdbx 5.3s 5.4s 6.9s 6.5s 5.4s
nf 3.6s 3.6s 4.4s 4.3s 3.7s
protein 15.5s 15.9s 15.9s 14.5s 12.9s
rnflow 11.4s 11.6s 12.6s 12.7s 12.2s
test_fpu 8.4s 8.5s 8.8s 8.5s 8.3s
tfft 1.3s 1.3s 1.8s 1.7s 1.3s
while the execution is about the same as in the series before.
Note that the two programs which compiled faster (air and
fatigue) now compile faster than before 01/05, but slower
than after 01/06.
> Quite impressing for such a little patch ;)
Yes, indeed! Thanks for the quick fix.
Dominique
