Richard Henderson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 01:26:51PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote: > >>I guess a secondary question is: is the workaround sufficiently useful >>in many of the problematic cases and sufficiently non-harmful in other >>cases as to merit inclusion, given that we don't have a better solution? > > > I replied with my suggestion for a workaround in the thread > with the actual patch.
Sorry, I missed that. Do you have a URL? I'd like to get that in the PR audit trail. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713
