On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 09:00 -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Jeffrey A Law wrote: > > > This does highlight one of the issues that keeps nagging at me. > > For an enumeration type, presumably we have TYPE_PRECISION set to > > the minimum precision necessary to hold all the values in the enum. > > What are TYPE_MIN_VAL/TYPE_MAX_VAL? Does TYPE_MAX_VALUE include > > values outside the enum, but which are included by the TYPE_PRECISION? > > In C++, there are no such values. In C++, the range of the type gets > rounded up to a power of two, so for: Great. That's what I expected to hear. Hopefully the C front end does something similar.
Jeff
