Re: 100x perfomance regression between gcc 3.4.5 and gcc 4.X

[tbp]

On 3/13/06, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think this is related, and a quick check with the patch shows
> still unaligned
> moves to the stack.
Patience is a virtue i guess :)
Is there good chances your inlining fix will hit mainline soon?