Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>> It seems like we're getting consensus around that approach, despite the
>> initial sentiment in the other direction from Mike and Joe. Mike, Joe,
>> do either of you care to argue the point? If not, I'll volunteer to
>> write some text for the web pages, and ask Gerald to find a place to put it.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html probably would be the best place for such
> a note.
I applied the following patch.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(650) 331-3385 x713
Index: lists.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/lists.html,v
retrieving revision 1.94
diff -c -5 -p -r1.94 lists.html
*** lists.html 28 Oct 2005 19:58:26 -0000 1.94
--- lists.html 13 Apr 2006 05:46:06 -0000
*************** as well as in
*** 38,47 ****
--- 38,53 ----
<li><p><b><a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/";>gcc</a></b>
is a high volume list for general development discussions about GCC.
Anything relevant to the development or testing of GCC and not
covered by other mailing lists is suitable for discussion here.</p>
+ <p>Recruiting postings, including recruiting for GCC or other
+ free software jobs, are not permitted on this list, or on any of the
+ other GCC mailing lists. If you are interested in hiring a GCC
+ developer, please visit the <a href="http://www.fsf.org/jobs";>FSF
+ jobs page</a>.</p>
+
<p>All major decisions and changes, like abandoning ports or front ends,
should be announced and discussed here. Ideally, this list should be
sufficient to follow the major trends and important news in GCC's
development process.</p></li>
