> > Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > Benjamin Redelings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > >> substitution.o:(.data+0x0): multiple definition of > >> `_ZN5boost7numeric5ublas21scalar_divides_assignIT_T0_E8computedE' > >> > > > > I can't make sense of that as a mangled name. It has template > > parameter references but no template definition. That suggests that > > it is purely abstract. But we shouldn't have a symbol for an abstract > > object. > > > > So this looks like a bug to me. > > > > Ian > > > Thanks! This is now PR28016
But right now what is given in the bug report is hard to reproduce as there is no source only snipits of sources (which goes against what is mentioned on http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html). -- Andrew
