Sohail Somani wrote:
> struct __some_random_name
> {
> void operator()(int & t){t++;}
> };
>
> for_each(b,e,__some_random_name());
>
> Would this require a new tree node like LAMBDA_FUNCTION or should the
> parser do the translation? In the latter case, no new nodes should be
> necessary (I think).Do you need new class types, or just an anonymous FUNCTION_DECL? -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713
