Jeffrey Law wrote on 12/22/06 01:09:
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 14:05 -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
In any case, that is not important. I agree that every SSA name in the
SSA table needs to have a DEF_STMT that is either (a) an empty
statement, or, (b) a valid statement still present in the IL.
Just to be 100% clear. This is not true at the current time; see the
discussion about the sharing of a single field for TREE_CHAIN and
SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT. If you want to make that statement true, then
you need to fix both the orphan problem and the sharing of a field
for SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT and TREE_CHAIN.
I think we are agreeing violently.
