> > Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 07:26:27AM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > | > David Edelsohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > > | > > Are 4.0 snapshots still necessary? I suspect they should be > | > > discontinued. > | > > | > 4.0 still seems to be regarded as an active branch. > | > > | > I don't mind closing it, myself. Does anybody think we should have a > | > 4.0.4 release? > | > | I'd like to see it closed. We have some bugs that are only open because > | they are targeted for 4.0.4 (fixed on all branches but 4_0). > | > | If Gaby's interested in doing one final release first, I'm fine with that. > | But I'd like to see it go away. > > Almost everybody has switched to 4.1+, but I've heard that sony people > might still be using 4.0.x based compiler.
We are still using a 4.0.2 based compiler but we already have plans to move to 4.1.x sometime in the next month or three. -- pinski
