Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sergei Organov writes: > > > > BTW, I've tried once to raise similar aliasing question in > > comp.std.c++. The result was that somebody started to talk about > > validity of pointers conversions that IMHO has nothing to do with > > strict aliasing, > > It's the same issue. > > > and the discussion died. > > It is relevant to comp.std.c++. It is not relevant to this list. > We're now way off-topic, so I'm leaving this discussion.
Well, is adhering of GCC to the C99 standard is indeed off-topic here? If so, I'd leave the discussion as well. Where should I discuss it then? Obviously not in comp.std.c++. -- Sergei.
