Paolo Carlini wrote:
New? Woverflow is not new, as far as I know, if was just a bit broken, especially in C++. But in these cases in particular, nothing should have changed since we branched 4.2.Well, certainly new wrt 4_1-branch, the last release branch...
By the way, "new" also wrt current 4_2-branch, in the sense that the latter doesn't emit *any* overflow warning for the snippet in 30465, with explicit -Wconversion too...
Paolo.
