> On 1/28/07, Jan Hubicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I am not quite sure what you mean by direct inlining here.  At -O2 G++
> Decorating everything in sight with attribute always_inline/noinline
> (flatten wasn't an option because it used to be troublesome and not as
> 'portable' across compilers).

BTW when inlining seems to make so noticeable difference, did you try to
use profile feedback?
> 
> >I would be interested to know about obvious mistakes GCC do - GCC now
> >has logic to set cost of inlining "wrapper" functions (ie functions
> >doing just one extra call and casts) to at most 0. It might be
> >interesting to know if some common scenarios are missed.
> I guess i should remove those attribute and see what it looks like.
> 
> >Well, we are working on it ;)
> >You can take a look at c++ benchmarks http://www.suse.de/~gcctest the
> >work is ongoing since cgraph was implemented in 2003, another retunning
> >happen at about 4.0 timeframe, 4.3 has the SSA based IPA that should be
> >another improvement.
> I'm aware of that progression and some of my code is already being tested
> http://www.suse.de/~gcctest/c++bench/raytracer/ ;)

I see, we didn't seem to make that much progress on this testcase
performance wise yet ;)

> >Concerning the frame sizes, we really need some kind of analysis from
> >where it is comming - ie whether GCC simply inline too much together, or
> >fail to pack well the structures using existing algorithm or it is
> >register pressure problem.
> I'm out of my league. I know the frontend_loop function isn't as
> horrible on x86-64, giving some credit to the register pressure
> hypothesis, but then that code isn't doing anything fancy.
> 
> For the other function, which heavily uses SSE vector intrinsics, g++
> is really doing a good job, if only for the, sometimes, duplicated
> structures here & there and the larger frame. But you can rule out
> g++'s inlining heuristic as it has no (or shouldn't have) any freedom.

Hmm, so then it should be esither structure packing or regalloc. I will
be able to take a look only after returning from a course.
Honza
> 
> If there's anything i can do, do not hesitate.
> And thanks for taking notice.

Reply via email to