Richard Sandiford wrote:
Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:My opinion:(set (subreg:HI (reg:SI) 2) ... DF_REF_READ_WRITE?yep, only case without PARTIALSorry if this is a daft question, but why would it be treated as a read? I thought that without strict_lowpart, this sort of subreg assignment was morally equivalent to a normal REG definition in which the upper bits are "don't care".
Yes, I said elsewhere to ignore this message... Paolo
