Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Kenny --
>
> I tried to get the simplest C program containing a function:
>
> void f() {}
>
> to go through LTO today, but the LTO reader says:
>
> ./empty-function.o:0: internal compiler error: in lto_static_init_local,
> at lto-tree-flags.def:747
>
> Apparently, this is because the static set-up in lto_static_init_local
> doesn't handle MEMORY_PARTITION_TAG (and perhaps other new tree nodes
> added after the original LTO branch).
>
> For reference, this is how I compiled the file:
>
> ./xgcc -B./ -flto -funit-at-a-time -g -c empty-function.c
> ./lto1 empty-function.o
>
> Would you be able to take a look at that? I would like to be able to
> begin pushing forward on getting small functions to go through the compiler.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
this does not surprise me at all.
my first pass was just a take no prisoners lets get the compile time
errors out.
now that we can compile, i will start looking inside today.
kenny
