xf. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-11/msg00293.html Mark Mitchell wrote: > The reason I want to make that assumption is that the part of this where > the representation is in question is once we reach RTL, right?
The representation in GIMPLE should also be discussed IMVHO. For GIMPLE Alex has invented DEBUG_STMT, which has the same properties as DEBUG_INSN in RTL (with one noteworthy difference, namely that having note-like GIPMLE statements is a totally new concept while DEBUG_INSN is just a wannabe-real-insn INSN_NOTE). Gr. Steven
