On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 07:22:47PM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Jack Howarth <howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu> > wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 05:52:03PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> On 04/19/2010 03:35 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > >>> The annoucement should probably note that targets which lack > >>> objdump currently can't build plugins. I've had about as much > >>> luck getting the patch to fix this... > > I thought plugins only work with ELF anyway? > > > > Well your review does pretty much amount to "because darwin lacks > > objdump like linux, the patch is rejected...". > > Stop that argument. You're fighting windmills.
See... http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-April/030984.html http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-April/030896.html http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-April/031041.html Now I suppose you could complain about the fact that I had to patch gcc 4.5.0 with a rejected patch from Duncan Sands to get dragon-egg to build but this is really tangential to the fact that with my proposed patch, darwin is perfectly capable of using plugins. Jack > > Ciao! > Steven
