On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, DJ Delorie wrote: > So, given all that, is there any way to add the "target-specific > size_t" portion without waiting for-who-knows-how-long for the intN_t > and enum-size-type projects to finish? Some form of interim API that > we can put in, so that we can start working on finding all the > assumptions about size_t, while waiting for the rest to finish?
I have no idea how ugly something supporting target-specific strings would be, since supporting such strings for these standard typedefs never seemed to be a direction we wanted to go in. (Obviously it's possible to convert only a subset of macros to use enums rather than strings, or to be hooks rather than macros.) -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
