On 11/09/2013 03:44 PM, Alec Teal wrote: > If Java must go, and it must have a replacement Ada makes sense. The > issues with Go (sadly, you guys are doing superb work) do make sense. > > I don't know enough about Java (the GCC front end and such) to know if > it should go, if it does go why should it be replaced?
It always was very useful for detecting bugs in GCC: the code flow tends to trigger bugs that don't get detected by the usual GCC testsuites. Andrew.
