> Across 10 runs we came in right at 70 minutes with the usual ~20 second > variance. So it's slightly slower than the default languages right now. > That doesn't help the cycle time for developers which was the major > point for me.
Your results still look a little strange to me... > As for Ada, I'm wondering if we should add it into the default > languages, but not require it for the bootstrap/regression test cycle > during stage1, but require it as we leave stage1. Thus, if a developer > has Ada installed, it'll build & test by default. > > And, yes I'm aware of the wonderful irony that I'm debugging a bootstrap > problem with Ada related to my recent work :-) > > Thoughts on the updated proposal? IMO we need a non-call-exception language in the default mix, whatever it is. -- Eric Botcazou
