Hi,
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 09:55:29AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Rainer Orth
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi H.J.,
> >
> >> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:32 AM, David Edelsohn <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:24 AM, H.J. Lu <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:01 AM, David Edelsohn <[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> FYI, DejaGNU 1.6.1 is not compatible with the GCC Testsuite. The GCC
> >>>>> Testsuite uses "unsetenv" in multiple instances and that feature has
> >>>>> been removed from DejaGNU. The testsuite is going to experience
> >>>>> DejaGNU errors when Fedora or OpenSUSE upgrades to a more recent
> >>>>> DejaGNU in the 1.6 series.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I am running Fedora 26 with dejagnu-1.6-2.fc26. What should I
> >>>> look for?
> >>>
> >>> ERROR: (DejaGnu) proc "unsetenv GCC_EXEC_PREFIX" does not exist.
> >>> The error code is NONE
> >>> The info on the error is:
> >>> invalid command name "unsetenv"
> >>> while executing
> >>> "::tcl_unknown unsetenv GCC_EXEC_PREFIX"
> >>> ("uplevel" body line 1)
> >>> invoked from within
> >>> "uplevel 1 ::tcl_unknown $args"
> >>>
> >>
> >> I checked my log. I didn't see them. Which log file do they appear in?
> >
> > unsetenv was only removed after DejaGnu 1.6 was released. The change is
> > in the git repo; so far there exists no post-1.6 release.
>
> That is why I wrote 1.6.1. I didn't know if 1.6-2 was from snapshot after
> 1.6.
>
> Future releases of DejaGNU will elicit errors from the GCC Testsuite
> as currently written. My message is a warning about future
> incompatibility.
from the current git-branch:
+Changes since 1.6:
+
+1. The user-visible utility procedure `unsetenv' has been removed. If
+ a testsuite uses any of these procedures, a copy of the procedure
+ should be made and placed in the lib directory of the testsuite.
+
gcc is not the only testsuite which breaks. From a quick look on
some of my local source-packages:
Python-2.7.13
Python-3.6.2
libffi-3.2.1
gcc-7.2.0
Maybe reporting this to the dejagnu-developers might be the better
approach:
author Ben Elliston <[email protected]> 2016-04-24 20:46:53 +1000
committer Ben Elliston <[email protected]> 2016-04-24 20:46:53 +1000
commit c7185dfb66b0b278709d869ba020eec8348796ef (patch)
regards
winfried
