On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 05:58:51PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: >On 4/3/20 5:54 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: >>Hi - >> >>>I believe we can quite easily customize mailman 2.1 to match our needs. >>>The biggest challenge I see is a proper testing as I don't see it easy >>>to set up a local mailman instance. I've got a patch that changes: >> >>I suppose we can do some local RPM respins - as long as these changes >>are small and rare. > >That would be great. Should I create a git repo where we'll stack these >changes? > >> Even with a deadish upstream, distro reporting >>would be nice, at least at the centos/fedora point (?), as a reference >>place to stash the patch and get us a bug#. > >Can you please do it for me as I don't have any experience with Fedora >packaging?
If you're volunteering to maintain your patch, perhaps you should try learning how to do that?
