* Joseph Myers: > glibc effectively treats them as unspecified behavior - we don't expect > them to produce any particular meaningful function return value (this > includes the possibility that such an invalid encoding might be returned > by a function given such an encoding as input), but if they result in > buffer overflows, infinite loops or similar, that's fixed as a bug.
I think the last part (the “bug”) is new. I welcome a consensus along those lines. I just want to highlight this aspect. Thanks, Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill
