John Tytgat wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Duncan Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> >> 5) 'make' is no longer included with !GCC. For new users, some >> indication in the documentation of where to obtain 'make' may be >> useful. > > True, basically I see this should be looked after by Autobuilder but it > has not been added yet. All the separate tools we traditionally bundled with GCC are in the autobuilder (breakages I referred to a few weeks ago notwithstanding). Yes, the binaries could be dumped inside the GCC archive easily, but there's potentially a can of worms here in terms of general distribution of autobuilt binaries, packages, etc. Traditional RISC OS usage would have us put those in the library path, or perhaps a separate application which is a container for unix tools. All of course maintained by RiscPkg. I'm not sure what the best way to progress with this is. I suspect Graham has some ideas. _______________________________________________ GCCSDK mailing list [email protected] Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
