> On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 15:59:16 +0100 John Tytgat wrote: > > Just after the GCCSDK GCC 4.1.1 release 1, I've made a new pre-release > [snip] > > The purpose of this release is simple: to figure out if the current shared > library support we have is good enough to deploy. By all means, play with > it, shake it and ask questions if something is not clear or not working. > The idea is to let Autobuilder produce (more) shared libraries and to > really start use this. > > RiscPKG packages are uploaded at: > [snip]
To allow downloading with !RiscPkg you need to add an index file. Why not add the GCCSDK pre-release 2 packages to the autobuilder website? I think previous discussions on the website led us to believe that there was not much to be gained by having a seperate testing site. Regards, Alan _________________________________________________________________ Imagine a life without walls. See the possibilities. http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/122465943/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ GCCSDK mailing list [email protected] Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
