alan buckley <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've managed to get it to build on Cygwin, but it takes a long
> time and I've usually had to restart the build to get it to
> complete when something went wrong.

It was a pain... Dunno why this happened, and I don't understand
why I could not find a lot of complaining about this with google.
Oh well...

> > I tried:

> > ../autobuilder/build -v libglib2.0-0

> I've got this to successfully build on Cygwin now and have just
> checked in my changes for packaging it. However see below...

Great, thanks!

> > Anyway, typing Ctrl-C gives:

> > ^CPackage libncurses5: ***Failure***
> > Dependency "libncurses5" failed for gettext
> > Dependency "gettext" failed for libglib2.0-0
> > Build for package "libglib2.0-0" failed

> > Anyone any ideas what is going on and what might be wrong?

> I have the exact same problem on Cygwin, and couldn't find a way
> to get libncurses5 to build. However it is not really needed for
> gettext so I cheated and added a "last-success" file to the
> libncurses5 directory in autobuilder/libraries and this fools it
> into thinking it has a working copy of libncurses5 and lets all
> the other things compile.

> I hope this helps.

It did! I tried finding out what was the problem with building
libncurses5 by following Peter Naulls suggestions. I found the
command causing it, but it did not mean very much to me.
Unfortunately my laptop decided to do a shutdown right after I
revived it from hibernation, dunno why, so I lost the screen with
the command on it, but it was something with 'tic -x', if that
means anything to anybody.

> FYI: My simple test of libglib2.0-0 made it look like the
> static build is working OK. I'm currently having trouble
> with linking for the shared version, but I think that is
> probably something I'm doing wrong.

My glib did not build. It seems the patchfile is not taking into
account this change:

http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/glib/trunk/glib-2.0.pc.in?r1=6868&r2=6925

One of the wiki pages suggests doing something to the
/etc/apt/sources.list file, which I did not do. Still, it seems my
glib is newer than the one the diff file.

Not really sure why that is.

Is this what Peter Naulls referred to?

Cheers,
Jan-Jaap

_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list [email protected]
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK

Reply via email to