In message <[email protected]> alan buckley <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:50:04 +0100 John Tytgat wrote: > > This confuses me. Yes, c++filt is an executable build from sources in > > binutils. But why say "needs to be shipped there" ? We don't have a > > separate binutils kit. And as this tool is only useful for C++ users, > > it is currently in the C++ compiler kit. > > Sorry, badly worded. I meant it looks as if it should be shipped as > part of the gcc kit (which includes the other binutils) rather than > the C++ kit. As you say it's probably useful only for c++ users, but > it appears in the binutils documentation which is why I thought it > may belong there. Yes, you've a point. I agree. You want me to change this, or will you do it ? John. -- John Tytgat, in his comfy chair at home BASS [email protected] ARM powered, RISC OS driven _______________________________________________ GCCSDK mailing list [email protected] Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
