John Tytgat wrote:
I'm not sure which commit you're referring to but in the past those math sources got changes in order to be buildable by Norcroft. Those changes were all undone (as far as I know) in UnixLib 5 as we dropped Norcroft support. So they are the same versions as Nick checked them originally in.
Sorry, the comments were not for those files, but against something similar: http://www.riscos.info/websvn/log.php?repname=gccsdk&path=%2Ftrunk%2Fgcc4%2Frecipe%2Ffiles%2Flibunixlib%2Flibm-dbl64%2F&rev=0&sc=0&isdir=1
*A* fix would be to remove the hidden_def() statements but I'm unsure why they were in the first place and secondly why a library thinks it should be able to use __isinff() and not isinff(). I doubt the removal is the right solution.
The call to __isinf et al is in our math.h. _______________________________________________ GCCSDK mailing list [email protected] Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
