On 11 Nov, Peter Naulls wrote in message
<[email protected]>:
> Steve Fryatt wrote:
[Soft FP vs Hard FP errors at linking]
> There's very little in the Autobuilder that links against the SCL, so the
> OSLib build is default options - soft-float for use with UnixLib. DeskLib
> does however have two builds, since the SCL things in the AB actually use
> that.
>
> You have a few options:
I've ended up building my own Hard-Float OSLib from the sources on
SourceForge. That didn't actually solve the problem; I was still getting
errors about the mis-match of FP types (as above).
After a lot of Googling, I ended up swapping around the order of the -L and
-l flags passed to GCC: I was using
Links = -L$(GCCSDK_INSTALL_ENV)/lib -L$(GCCSDK_LIBS)/OSLib-Hard/ -lOSLib32 \
-L$(GCCSDK_LIBS)/SFLib/ -lSFLib32 -L$(GCCSDK_LIBS)/FlexLib/
-lFlexLib32
and swapping this to
Links = -L$(GCCSDK_LIBS)/OSLib-Hard/ -lOSLib32 -L$(GCCSDK_INSTALL_ENV)/lib \
-L$(GCCSDK_LIBS)/SFLib/ -lSFLib32 -L$(GCCSDK_LIBS)/FlexLib/
-lFlexLib32
(ie. reversing the first line) made the error go away. I have to admit that
I don't really understand why -- can anyone explain?
Anyway, the result seems to run correctly over RISC OS (at least after a
very superficial test), so it seems to have sorted it.
Thanks for all the help thus far; I'm sure there will be more questions,
though.
--
Steve Fryatt - Leeds, England
http://www.stevefryatt.org.uk/
_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list [email protected]
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
