In message <[email protected]> Chris Gransden <[email protected]> wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, > John Tytgat <[email protected]> wrote: > > In message <[email protected]> > > Chris Gransden <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > In article <[email protected]>, > > > Frank de Bruijn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > That's where I put it yesterday. Fetching the files for tcp-wrappers > > > > wouldn't have worked correctly if I hadn't. > > > > > > I've found the problem with tcp-wrappers. There's a newer version of > > > 'signal.h' in trunk than in the 4.1.2 branch. You get get it from > > > http://www.riscos.info/websvn/filedetails.php?repname=gccsdk&path=%2Ftrunk%2Fgcc4%2Frecipe%2Ffiles%2Fgcc%2Flibunixlib%2Finclude%2Fsignal.h. > > > It goes in > > > 'cross/arm-unknown-riscos/include'. > > > This advice might solve a build problem but if tcp-wrappers is really > > using the siginfo_t feature, then you will have a problem at runtime. > > It was just a workaround to get 'build-libs -a' to complete. A very noble task. :-) > The rest of > the changes are part of r5568. Is it possible to apply these to the 4.1.2 > branch as well? The branches/release_4_1_2 is a stable branch is in priniple only meant to get bug fixes. I'm not sure whether the siginfo_t changes can be qualified as such. Lee actually contributed this, so perhaps he can give some insight how risky this change is. John. -- John Tytgat, in his comfy chair at home [email protected] _______________________________________________ GCCSDK mailing list [email protected] Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
