In article <5636098b....@aaug.net>, John Tytgat <john.tyt...@aaug.net> wrote:
> However, the __FUNCTION__ vs __func__ isn't a problem at all. During the > build you get a lot of warnings that __FUNCTION__ is not ISO C and > that's because of the -Wpedantic compile option. Those are warnings, > not errors. So I don't see a reason for the __FUNCTION__ to __func__ > rename. > I didn't followup on the toolchain-riscos.cmake nor autobuilder project > changes. Could someone else have a loop at that ? Everything is done apart from the warning ones and oslib. Best to change oslib upstream? _______________________________________________ GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
