Hello, I don't mind using what you have so far.
Thanks, Howard On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:14 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > We, that's Bill McCarthy and me, are working on this, but it's not an > official part of GCCXML (yet?) and therefore not in CVS. We worked on > the code separate from each other, and are now trying to merge our > results. > So if you don't care about using a half-baked implementation, feel > free to get in touch. > > Kind regards, > DJ > > 2008/3/6, Howard Mullings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I saw a message about Function Bodies support > > I built the gccxml today but it doesn't appear to dump of function > bodies. > > Is there a way to get this feature? > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > Howard > > > > Brad King wrote: > > > > > Bill McCartney wrote: > > > > I know that the code is being restructured, but I have gotten > function > > > > > > > body dumping working on the cvs head. I am cleaning up the code now, > but > > > > I was wondering what the prefix on the functions should be... > > > > > > Thanks for working on this. The prefix should probably be "xml_body_". > > > > > > I'd also like the feature to be enabled only if a "-fxml-body" option > > > is given on the command line. For now you can just create a > > > "xml_body_enabled" global variable in xml.c and test it before > > > > > > dispatching calls to xml_body_ functions. If I'm happy with your > > > implementation I'll integrate them and convert the variable to an > option > > > and integrate. > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gccxml mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.gccxml.org/mailman/listinfo/gccxml > > > > > -- Thanks, Howard
_______________________________________________ gccxml mailing list [email protected] http://www.gccxml.org/mailman/listinfo/gccxml
