On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Brad King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Roman Yakovenko wrote: >> Good evening. >> >> Brad, can you explain your last commit? >> >> "... BUG: xml_output_record_type should perform lazy declaration of >> implicitly declared constructors, destructors, and assignment >> operators so they are reported in the output. See issue #7148. ..." >> >> Can you give an example of a code that this commit fix? > > It was a fix for this bug: > > http://www.gccxml.org/Bug/view.php?id=7148 > > For this code: > > struct A { template <class T> A(T&); }; > > gccxml was dumping no constructors at all which made the class look > default-constructible. We still don't dump the template, but now > someone reading the output can assume from the lack of a default > constructor that there is no such constructor available. > >> Code generation for Boost.Python could be very tricky, especially when >> it is related to constructors and destructors. > > After this fix, all constructors and destructors that exist for a class > are dumped whether the user declared them or not. Those that were > implicitly declared by the compiler are marked as "artificial".
Thanks for the update. I run my tests with this change and few of them failed. I guess, I have another session of tweaking :-). -- Roman Yakovenko C++ Python language binding http://www.language-binding.net/ _______________________________________________ gccxml mailing list [email protected] http://www.gccxml.org/mailman/listinfo/gccxml
