Julian Bunn wrote:
Thanks Brad: this is very useful. I will check to see that I have the correct sigc++ configuration in my set up before worrying the authors: it's possible I have inadvertently used the wrong flags.

I'm pretty sure that libsigc++ needs to change if gccxml is to be supported in general. If you happen to configure/build/install libsigc++ with a gcc 4.2 compiler then gccxml will be happy, but just by accident. With proper fixes to libsigc++ you should be able to build it with any compiler and still parse it with gccxml.

-Brad
_______________________________________________
gccxml mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.gccxml.org/mailman/listinfo/gccxml

Reply via email to