On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Brad King <brad.k...@kitware.com> wrote:
> Hi Roman,
Hello.
> Kyle Girard wrote:
>> I ripped most of the following from QT's headers
>
> I shrank Kyle's example down to
>
> template <typename> class A {};
> template <typename T> void f(A<T> const& a) { A<__typeof__(a)>(); }
> template void f<int>(A<int> const& a);
>
> See http://www.gccxml.org/Bug/view.php?id=10183
>
> Also, http://www.gccxml.org/Bug/view.php?id=10185
> has this test case:
>
> template <typename T> struct A {};
> template <int N> struct A<const char[N]>
> { static int size(const char[N]) { return N - 1; } };
Thanks. I added both issues to my unit tests. Basically I wanted to
see that those changes/additions doesn't break pygccxml.
> We're still working on http://www.gccxml.org/Bug/view.php?id=10184
Unfortunately can't help you :-(. The only thing I can do ( and did )
is to try the recent changes on my computer. Actually, everything
looks nice. All my tests passed.
> Thanks again for the pygccxml test suite!
You are welcome.
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.gccxml.org/mailman/listinfo/gccxml
