Greetimgs! Just another followup here: "Paul F. Dietz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Whoops, I made a mistake reading the page for simple-array. Yes, > > you're right, you can do that. > > I want to add that you may not *want* to do it, if it forces > array operations to be slow even if the program has a simple-array > declaration. > I think the spec indicates that simple-vector should be (simple-array * ...), not (simple-array t ...). type-of.1 requires this, but the following then fail: CL-TEST::SIMPLE-VECTOR-IS-SIMPLE-1D-ARRAY.1, CL-TEST::SIMPLE-VECTOR-IS-SIMPLE-1D-ARRAY.3, CL-TEST::SIMPLE-VECTOR-IS-SIMPLE-1D-ARRAY.5, CL-TEST::STRING-IS-NOT-SIMPLE-VECTOR, CL-TEST::BASE-STRING-IS-NOT-SIMPLE-VECTOR, CL-TEST::SIMPLE-STRING-IS-NOT-SIMPLE-VECTOR, CL-TEST::SIMPLE-BASE-STRING-IS-NOT-SIMPLE-VECTOR, CL-TEST::BIT-VECTOR-IS-NOT-SIMPLE-VECTOR, CL-TEST::SIMPLE-BIT-VECTOR-IS-NOT-SIMPLE-VECTOR. Take care, > Paul > > > _______________________________________________ > Gcl-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel > > > -- Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] ========================================================================== "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah _______________________________________________ Gcl-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
