Greetings! Robert Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Presumably, it would be much more efficient to use the Linux C call setitimer > and have GCL be prepared to accept a SIGALRM and then figure out which > with-timeout catch, if any, to throw to. > Agreed -- and it appears unused so far so we would not have to worry about unintended consequences. Please let me know if you feel there is a need for this outside of the select framework I've described previously. Take care, > Bob > > > > -- Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] ========================================================================== "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah _______________________________________________ Gcl-devel mailing list Gcl-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
