Greetings! Wonder if it is legit to move *push-events* up to the non-existent safety 4 level, in case someone needs it for backward compatibility.
Take care, Robert Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > safety 3 has come up recently. This mode is actually slower than running > > interpreted in many cases. > > That's one of the funniest things I have heard in a long time. It's like > hearing of a compression algorithm actually producing a longer file. > > This may be a half baked reply: Compiled code should never run slower than > interpreted code, excepting of course in deliberately weird situations. > There is *no point* in having compiled code if it is not faster. A possible > and simple fix is simply to save, and later run, the interpreted code, after > expanding macros, somehow disguising the code as "compiled" to save the > appearances, e.g., compiled-function-p. A pretty general assumption for > Lisps is that compiled code always has had all of its macros expanded out. > > Bob > > > > > -- Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] ========================================================================== "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah _______________________________________________ Gcl-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
