Dear GCL hackers, trying to support gcl 2.7 and 2.6 in cl-launch, I found a difficulty due to GCL insisting on adding the suffix .lsp if none is provided when compiling. Shouldn't GCL at least give a chance to the user and only add the suffix if the file doesn't exist without suffix?
The behaviour is documented in section Compilation of gcl-si, but I believe it is non-compliant. I had a similar problem with clisp, but clisp has some custom variables to remove the problem. Does there already exist a similar variable for GCL, and if not, can one be added? Apart from that, cl-launch seems to work rather well with gcl 2.7, except that I don't support image-dumping yet. Is there documentation/code/examples on how to create an executable from an asdf system that has dependencies? [ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] The Constitution may not be perfect, but it's a lot better than what we've got! _______________________________________________ Gcl-devel mailing list Gcl-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
