Greetings! My mistake -- I thought maxima was overwriting some GCL functions. This is not the case -- my apologies.
In any case, should be fixed now. Please let me know if problems persist. Take care, "Robert Dodier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Camm, > > > I take it maxima redefines toplevel or equivalent -- then why not call > > (get-temp-dir) in the redefined version? > > I must be missing something here. I really don't see how Maxima, > or any random user program, can take on the responsibility to > initialize its Lisp implementation. > > > Everyone is area of *top-level-hook*, yes? The way it appears to me > > at the moment, get-temp-dir would be properly invoked were the maxima > > toplevel to be invoked via this hook. > > It appears that *top-level-hook* is GCL-specific (it doesn't appear in CLHS) > but if we can resolve this problem by arranging to be called > via *top-level-hook*, that would be better than calling (get-temp-dir) > directly. > > All the best > Robert > _______________________________________________ > Maxima mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima > > > -- Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] ========================================================================== "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah _______________________________________________ Gcl-devel mailing list Gcl-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
