> Following a tip from the folks at ut, I've gotten good results with > simple emacs running gcl in an inferior shell, and using the tags > facilities extensively. C-M-a, C-M-u, C-M-f, M-. tag-name, M-x > tags-search <RET> tag-name followed by M-, etc. That said, I'd like > to get slime working (never used it yet). Perhaps someone might > summarize/refresh the list of obstacles remaining? A lot of ansi > work has been done since the last assessment.
Actually, I'm quite comfortable at the moment running GCL in inferior lisp mode. I read somewhere where it was suggested that inferior lisp mode was for casual common lisp programming only; so I wondered what the GCL aficionados were using as an interface. I'm back using GCL after a year long non-programming project myself, so I'm trying to get up to speed, but if I do find the compatibility issues with Slime I'll make sure to list them for you. Adrienne _______________________________________________ Gcl-devel mailing list Gcl-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
