Greetings! Can you please refresh my memory on what you feel the desired policy should be on building the documentation?
Take care, Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > | XLIB>pdflatex dwdoc.tex > | /bin/bash: pdflatex: command not found > | make[1]: *** [dwdoc.pdf] Error 127 > | make[1]: Leaving directory `/export/home0/wspage/gcl/xgcl-2' > | make: *** [unixport/saved_gcl] Error 2 > | > | ------ > | > | It is true that I don't have LaTeX installed but am quite > | sure that I used to be able to build gcl-2.6.8pre without > | LaTeX present. I needed to install LaTeX anyway so now build > | completes ok. Is this a new dependency or is something wrong? > > I thought Camm fixed this. > > Hmm. wait; it was for texinfo, not pdflatex. So, I believe we should > do the same for pdflatex -- it does not always make sense to insist on > building the documentation; some programs like Axiom, are just trying > to use GCL underneath. > > -- Gaby > > > -- Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] ========================================================================== "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah _______________________________________________ Gcl-devel mailing list Gcl-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
