Greetings! [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 1. I built an ordinary 2.6.8pre yesterday Can I build an > ANSI one too, in the same directory, and have both, or do > I need to make a separate copy? > Alas, you need a spearate copy. make clean in the new dir first, please. > 2. Briefly, how ANSI is it? I'm asking because I have an > AI planning system (O-Plan) that used to work in plain GCL, > and I'd like to get it going again in a recent version. > O-Plan's also worked in Lucid and ACL, so adapting to an > ANSI CL shouldn't be a big problem, but it spent years > longer in GCL and I'd like to get it going in GCL again > quickly. On the other hand, ANSI's better for the longer > term. > > So, if ANSI GCL is "ANSI enough" I'd probably go the ANSI > route. But I don't want to move to a GCL that's, say, > kinda half way between. > > BTW, though I say it's been in plain GCL, I added defpackage > and loop using publicly available sources, and I used a > CLOS subset I wrote myself, so having solid versions of > those features would be nice. > Its pretty good. CVS is even better. There are no new non-ansi intermediates introduced into GCL, so any porting work you do now will not be lost. Take care, > -- Jeff > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gcl-devel mailing list > Gcl-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel > > > -- Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] ========================================================================== "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah _______________________________________________ Gcl-devel mailing list Gcl-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
