Camm, It seems to be a Ubuntu thing since 7.04. You will probably find other distros doing similar things.
I didn't see any obvious way to check whether the stack protect option is on by default. Tim Josling On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 09:45 -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings! > > Please try > > CFLAGS=-fno-stack-protector ./configure (configure opts ...) && make > > and let me know if possible what gcc/kernel/libc combination puts this > stuff in by default, then I can have configure add this automatically. > > There is probably nothing wrong in principal with stack protection in > GCL if desired, as we do not execute on the stack. But o/plttest.c > needs modification to include references to this symbol, so GCL can > find it later when loading objects. I bet alloca would do it, but I > don't have a system on which to test this. > > Take care, > > > Blake McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I get the following during the make: > > > > ;; Compiling ../lsp/gcl_listlib.lsp. > > ;; End of Pass 1. ;; End of Pass 2. ;; OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=3, > > Space=0, Speed=3, (Debug quality ignored) > > ;; Finished compiling ../lsp/gcl_listlib.o. > > ;; Loading /home/blake/Backup/gcl/lsp/gcl_listlib.o > > __stack_chk_fail is undefined > > > > Error: ERROR "Cannot get relocated section contents > > " > > Fast links are on: do (si::use-fast-links nil) for debugging > > Signalled by LOAD1. > > ERROR "Cannot get relocated section contents > > " > > > > Broken at LOAD1. Type :H for Help. > > >>make: *** [unixport/saved_pre_gcl] Error 255 > > # > > > > > > Help would be appreciated. > > > > Blake McBride > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gcl-devel mailing list > > Gcl-devel@gnu.org > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Gcl-devel mailing list Gcl-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
