Let's keep the list involved, in case someone else has a similar question/problem later.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Jim Ward<se...@uwyo.edu> wrote: > Ok, made the changes, looks like gcl built, but now I build errors looks > like for selinux. selinux is disable (but installed) on our systems (to > much a pain). How can I disable selinux part, partial output below. Okay, so we need to rip the SELinux parts out, too. Result attached. > Oh and before I forget, does this install into /usr/local or /usr? I would > really like to avoid installing gcl on about 70+ linux machines and just > install it once into /usr/local. Hmmmmm..... Well, rpm builds for /usr by default. I can think of two ways to try addressing this. First, maybe we can just define _prefix to /usr/local in the spec file. I've added that to the attached version, but I don't know if it will work. However, now you have an RPM-managed package in /usr/local, which doesn't seem like a good thing. The second approach to try is to only do the "rpmbuild -bp" part to get the patches applied, etc., then manually configure and build following the recipe in the spec file so that you can control the resulting install prefix. > And did I say THANKS!!!!! You are very welcome. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/
gcl.spec
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Gcl-devel mailing list Gcl-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel