Ah! I haven't checked recently, though I do remember some things referencing older versions of GCL. Other than version-specific items, it would probably be best to make the readme files generic anyway.
Will check it out. Best, _don On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Camm Maguire <c...@maguirefamily.org> wrote: > Thanks so much! Do any readme files need updating in the source tree? > > Take care, > > Donald Winiecki <dwinie...@boisestate.edu> writes: > >> I've just configured a Windows7 machine and confirmed that setting up >> build tools to compile GCL on Win7 should be done following the >> published directions for WinVista. >> >> (In fact, as some who have followed previous discussions on this list >> know, building GCL on an updated WinXP machine requires that one >> follow the published directions for Vista rather than XP -- this owing >> to what we can call the `Vistafication' of WinXP as patches are >> installed.) >> >> I'll be updating the directions soon and can make those available to the >> group. >> >> Best, >> >> _don >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gcl-devel mailing list >> Gcl-devel@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel >> >> >> >> > > -- > Camm Maguire c...@maguirefamily.org > ========================================================================== > "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah > _______________________________________________ Gcl-devel mailing list Gcl-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
