Fahre writes:

> Ping?
> 
> One function that fails to return the same thing when compiled vs
> interpreted is REDUCE/STRCAT from uiop/utility.lisp.
> 

Thanks!  Should be fixed now.

> Another function that behaves in a weird way is configure-asdf from
> test/script-support.lisp, whereby the form
> (acall :pathname-directory-pathname (nth-value 2 (acall :locate-system
> :test-asdf)))
> returns NIL when (load-asdf) is run, vs the proper answer (the
> pathname of .../asdf/test/) when (configure-asdf) is run directly.
> Possibly, the fact that the functions are being (re)defined while
> (load-asdf) is run is confusing GCL. Or maybe there's a problem with
> multiple-values in some operation mode.
> 

Thanks!  No longer the case, perhaps resolved when the above was fixed.

> Can you look into it? There are other failures, but these are show stoppers.

A few more tests pass now.  Thanks for your reports!  It would still be
a bit easier if you could give me step by step instructions to reproduce
a failure -- I don't know where any of these functions are, or what has
to be loaded, etc.

Take care,
--
Camm Maguire                                        c...@maguirefamily.org
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah

_______________________________________________
Gcl-devel mailing list
Gcl-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel

Reply via email to