Which is fine except you can't define a compiler-macro for functions in the COMMON-LISP package. Maybe on this case we don't care.
Ray On Fri, May 2, 2025, 12:02 PM Robert Dodier <robert.dod...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 2, 2025 at 10:38 AM Andreas Eder via Maxima-discuss > <maxima-disc...@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > > It would be clearer to just let the ":test #'eq" stand, both to the > compiler and to the reader of the code. > > That is just a normal Common Lisp idiom, no need to perpetuate MacLisp > traditions. > > I am 100% on board with that, we don't need a function with an > idiosyncratic name which does the same thing as (member ... :test > #'eq). > > Robert >
