Hi,
Philip Van Hoof wrote:
o. We are planning to take a look at reducing the daemon in functionality. So where possible, we want to move functionality to
the library. Questions on this: Is it a good idea? It looks like the
OpenOffice.org and the KDE people prefer a VERY small and insignificant daemon.
I guess you got that impression about the OpenOffice.org opinion from my post on the xdg list. Actually I am currently rather indifferent on this, as I have no real data about the trade-offs. I think for D-Conf we need to reconsider this issue based on the eventual requirements and maybe a little prototyping. OTOH for gconf this architectural decision was made long ago. If you are aiming for a gconf-3 that might qualify to become D-Conf, I would not change that unless the D-Conf discussion makes this a strong design constraint.
IOW my suggestion for a gconf-based design is to leave this as is.
Ciao, Joerg _______________________________________________ gconf-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gconf-list
