NIIBE Yutaka <gni...@fsij.org> wrote: > Honestly speaking, it's "Least Leak Intended", and I couldn't declare > it constant-time.
I pushed the change for _gcry_mpih_mul_lli. And I also pushed the change for _gcry_mpih_mod_lli. The implementation was already there, it's renaming _gcry_mpih_mod_lli from _gcry_mpih_mod. -- _______________________________________________ Gcrypt-devel mailing list Gcrypt-devel@gnupg.org https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gcrypt-devel
