"Harmen Stoppels" <har...@stoppels.ch> writes: > Any examples of compilers that do not do that?
Since we occasionally got reports from IBM, this time, I tested on AIX, specifically, on the cfarm111 machine [0]. For the IBM XL C compiler on that machine, appending -O0 doesn't work as you intended. While it allows multiple -O[number] options, its decision seems to be most higher optimization level among multiple options. [0] https://portal.cfarm.net/machines/list/ -- _______________________________________________ Gcrypt-devel mailing list Gcrypt-devel@gnupg.org https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gcrypt-devel
